mememiner

a blog by wallace winfrey

How Bush Intends To Keep Us In Iraq After He’s Gone

By

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/25/bush_plan_for_iraq_would_be_a_first/
“President Bush’s plan to forge a long-term agreement with the Iraqi government that could commit the US military to defending Iraq’s security would be the first time such a sweeping mutual defense compact has been enacted without congressional approval, according to legal specialists.

At a House hearing on the pact on Wednesday, Representative Dana Rohrabacher, Republican of California and a former Reagan administration official, accused the Bush administration of “arrogance” for not consulting with Congress about the pact. If it includes any guarantees to Iraq, he said, Congress must sign off.
“We are here to fulfill the constitutional role established by the founding fathers,” Rohrabacher said, adding, “It is not all in the hands of the president and his appointees. We play a major role.”

“A commitment that the United States will act to assist Iraq, potentially through the use of our armed forces in the event of an attack on Iraq, could effectively commit the nation to engage in hostilities,” Biden wrote. “Such a commitment cannot be made by the executive branch alone under our Constitution.””
It’s just one thing after another with these guys. It’s not enough to do all the damage they can in the 8 years they hold office. They’re gonna try to force their insane policies on the next (likely Democratic) administration as well.
Ultimately it will go to the courts, and how it ultimately winds up will depend on whether Justice Kennedy sides with the Roberts/Alito/Scalia/Thomas unitary executive theorists or with the Souter/Ginsburg/Stevens/Breyer separation of powers adherents.
Hopefully by the time that the Supreme Court hears this case, Clinton or Obama will be in office and the current unitary executive proponents will be having second thoughts about advancing that power to a Democratic administration.

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on How Bush Intends To Keep Us In Iraq After He’s Gone

Missing White House emails

By

There’s this article in Time Magazine entitled “Where Are The White House Emails?”
The answer is pretty obvious. They were intentionally destroyed. They were destroyed because they contained information that’s either damaging or embarrassing to the White House. This should be plainly obvious to everyone. For all that talk back in the 90s from the Republicans about the “missing Rose Law Firm billing records“, their silence on this issue is deafening.
I am so sick of being outraged by this administration. It’s just one thing after another. “Ignore it” some might say. If my children’s future wasn’t being so damaged by the decisions that are being made there, maybe I could – but all I see is the most evil, corrupt and incompetent administration in American history. It’s difficult for me to see how people can still justify their votes for Bush.

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on Missing White House emails